Robert Barta

Type(s): Person

I would prefer if TM processing does NOT do too much link magic. If we keep it orthogonal then the standard has some freedom later. (xtm-href-xpointer)
No magic here please. This is NOT about hyperlinks, btw. (xtm-xlink-actuate)
I agree that this is not a strong form of "conformance" and that TM?L will be a much stronger vehicle to do that. (sam-conformance)
1.1 ? But if so, then there we need a backward compatibility chapter (and maybe an XSLT sheet). (xtm-version)
The part about the subject...is it necessary here? Looks more as an abstract introduction into TMs. (term-subject-def)
No. xml:base is an ugly cludge which is mostly used to hide design flaws. If someone needs it he can create submaps. I could live with it on the toplevel, but that's about it. :-) (xtm-xmlbase-everywhere)
I like URIs a lot. Yes. (xtm-schema-uri)
No, raise error. This is XML, anyway, so strictness is ok. (xtm-href-whitespace)

Object id: 126
Item identifier(s):
[file:/apps/ontopia.net/tomcat/ontopia-5.3.0/topicmaps/tm-standards.xtm#barta]